Contract Security
- Code audits
- Source verification
- Backdoors
- Mint / burn functions
- Proxy risks
- Honeypot checks
ClarityAIClarityAI collects available contract, liquidity, holder, market, wallet, and public reputation evidence, then shows what was verified, what could not be checked, and how each scored signal affected the result.
Based on 215+ on-chain
and off-chain signals
ClarityAI scans the available on-chain and off-chain footprint of a token, evaluates 100+ data points across eight weighted pillars, and combines the verified signals through its scoring model into one easy-to-understand Clarity Score from 300–900.
The quick cards above are the summary. This view exposes the deeper evidence engine. Checks are asset-aware: non-applicable signals are excluded, and unavailable evidence is reported as a gap rather than treated as safe.
A scan turns scattered technical and market evidence into one structured risk view. It is decision support—not a promise of safety, profit, or future performance.
Surface dangerous ownership controls, liquidity weakness, concentrated holders, deployer links and other evidence before committing capital.
Use sellability, tax, restriction, liquidity and slippage evidence to identify situations where buying may be easy but exiting may not be.
Bring contract, liquidity, tokenomics, holder, governance, market and project evidence into one place when a new token has limited history.
See FDV/circulating-supply pressure and verified vesting or upcoming unlock evidence when those schedules are available.
Identify top-holder exposure, linked-wallet patterns and synchronized acquisition that can make a token more fragile than its chart suggests.
Understand admin, proxy, multisig, timelock, mint, freeze, blacklist and other privileged controls instead of assuming a contract is immutable.
Evidence Coverage shows when ClarityAI could not verify something, so “unknown” is not silently presented as “safe.”
Versioned score history can show meaningful movement in the score and the evidence behind that movement.
Overlapping sources are compared where possible. Material disagreements become visible confidence issues rather than disappearing behind one number.
The 300–900 score is paired with grades, evidence, deductions, coverage and methodology information so you can inspect why the result exists.
ClarityAI analyzes the wallet’s available on-chain footprint across supported networks, verifies the evidence it can resolve, and combines behavior, counterparties, DeFi activity, risk exposure, and coverage into one Wallet Clarity Score from 300–900.
Transaction history, wallet age, consistency and overall on-chain activity.
12+ MetricsWhere funds came from, who the wallet interacts with, and counterparty risk.
15+ MetricsTrading patterns, holding behavior, profitability and position management.
14+ MetricsActive approvals, protocol usage, LP positions, bridges and delegations.
16+ MetricsScam exposure, honeypots, malicious interactions and contract risk.
13+ MetricsNetwork coverage, evidence completeness, freshness and scoring confidence.
9+ MetricsThe six pillars above are the summary. This view exposes the deeper wallet evidence used when it is available and applicable.
Total transactions, wallet age, active days/frequency, native-coin activity, token diversity, first/last activity, inflow/outflow behavior and longitudinal consistency.
Source of funds, linked wallets/clusters, known entities and labels, exchange flows, high-risk connections, whale/smart-money relationships and tainted-fund exposure where verifiable.
Buy/sell behavior, holding time, realized/unrealized outcomes where available, repeated entry/exit patterns, token rotation, unusual timing and behavior-model indicators.
Active and unlimited approvals, protocol interactions, LP/staking/farming positions, bridge usage, contract interactions, delegated permissions and suspicious approval exposure.
Scam/rug token exposure, honeypot interactions, malicious contract calls, phishing signatures, mixer exposure, sanctions/blacklist evidence and exploit/drain history where supported.
Chains scanned, data completeness, entity verification, label confidence, source consistency, freshness and cross-chain correlation. Missing evidence is shown as missing—not silently treated as safe.
A wallet scan organizes scattered on-chain evidence into a faster risk and behavior review. It is decision support—not a guarantee of safety or future performance.
Surface interactions with scams, honeypots, malicious contracts and other known risk evidence.
Review counterparties, exchange flows, linked wallets and high-risk funding relationships.
See active or unlimited permissions and suspicious protocol interactions where supported.
Separate longer-term activity from rapid rotation, unusual trading patterns and other behavioral signals.
Use wallet history and relationship evidence before sending funds, copying trades or entering a deal.
Coverage and evidence quality help show how much verified information sits behind the result.
8-grade reports expose the eight primary grades plus historical score movement, unlock/vesting intelligence, linked-wallet indicators, governance controls, market corroboration, methodology version, and evidence coverage wherever those facts can be verified. Presale screening and AI chart analysis remain research tools—not guarantees of safety or future price.
Paste a contract address, public wallet, project name, or website. Supported token scans break the result into Contract/Protocol, Liquidity/Exit, Holder/Insider, Tokenomics, Wallet Behavior, Governance, Market Integrity, and Project/Deployer grades, then show the sources, coverage, history, and critical evidence behind the 300–900 score.
Ethereum, Solana, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, World Chain, zkSync, and Robinhood Chain use ClarityAI's deepest current token/security paths when upstream evidence exists. Reports can include contract/protocol controls, liquidity/exit risk, holder/insider concentration, tokenomics/unlocks, direct-chain wallet relationships, governance/admin verification, market integrity, project/deployer credibility, independent trade simulation, and multi-source corroboration.
Algorand scans ASAs and authority controls; Hedera scans HTS tokens, NFTs, and allowances; Cosmos resolves IBC assets and staking; Cardano aggregates native assets; Filecoin includes FEVM ERC-20s; Sui and Aptos use Move-specific evidence; TON inspects Jetton master controls; and TRON scans TRC-20 contracts plus live token allowances.
Hyperliquid adds HyperCore leverage/liquidation context plus HyperEVM balances. Monad, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, XRP Ledger, Stellar, Kaspa, Polkadot, NEAR, and Internet Computer use wallet/account evidence appropriate to their native model rather than forcing EVM-style checks where those checks do not apply.
Coverage expansion is focused on deeper Hyperliquid/HyperEVM and Monad contract intelligence, richer chain-native risk evidence for the additional wallet networks, and new networks only after dependable evidence sources have been verified.
Live coverage can include all eight primary grades plus sellability, taxes, LP evidence, vesting/unlocks, holder-wallet funding/distribution patterns, synchronized acquisition, multisig/timelock verification, market-provider agreement, methodology version, score history, and evidence coverage. Non-applicable checks stay out of the score; unavailable evidence is identified instead of being treated as safe. The main report shows applicable evidence instead of filling the screen with non-applicable or unavailable checks.
Enter what the project is promising. The checker is structured around the same risk philosophy as the eight-grade model: tokenomics and unlocks, liquidity/exit plans, contract availability, governance/admin claims, team/project credibility, fundraising terms, and source-verification gaps.
Upload or paste a crypto chart screenshot and Clari will inspect only what is visibly supported: trend and market structure, support/resistance, momentum, volume when visible, setup quality, possible entry/confirmation zones, targets, invalidation, and warnings.
Core scanning is temporarily open while ClarityAI is being completed and strengthened. At $CLAI utility activation, this entry tier becomes the $CLAI Holder Tier: a connected wallet must hold the required $CLAI balance to receive the configured daily scan allowance. The final holder amount and daily allowance will be published before activation. Guardian and Sentinel remain separate planned paid tiers.
Use the core tools now. After $CLAI utility activation, access converts to token-holder eligibility instead of a permanent free tier.
Planned for active crypto traders and investors.
Planned for funds, launchpads, teams, and high-activity portfolios.
Clarity Scores cannot be purchased or improved through payment or token holdings. $CLAI holder status changes access only; Guardian and Sentinel are intended to increase depth, monitoring, exports, and service access—not alter risk findings.
The first planned $CLAI utility is the Holder Tier. Launch Access is temporarily free; after utility activation, a user connects a wallet and must hold the published minimum $CLAI balance to unlock a published daily allowance of core scans. Holding changes access—not the Clarity Score—and scans do not spend or burn tokens unless future tokenomics are explicitly changed and disclosed. Additional planned utility may include portfolio monitoring, alerts, API credits, governance, and advanced intelligence.
The minimum holder balance, daily scan allowance, official contract, chain, and activation date are intentionally not hard-coded until final tokenomics and launch details are approved. Verify the official contract before interacting with any token claiming to be $CLAI.
No official purchase link or contract address is connected in this build. ClarityAI will not direct users to a generic launch page that could be confused with an official token listing.
During the current launch-access stage, core scanning remains temporarily free. At $CLAI utility activation, the entry tier changes to holder-gated access: connect a read-only wallet, meet the published minimum $CLAI balance, and receive the published daily core-scan allowance. Exact thresholds remain pending final tokenomics.
Use supported core scans while the product and launch mechanics are finalized.
Required $CLAI balance → configured daily scan allowance. Eligibility is based on holdings; holding tokens never improves a risk score.
Separate paid depth, monitoring, exports, service levels, API access, governance, and integrations as they become available.
Live token and native-asset intelligence, manual and connected-wallet portfolio reports, transparent 300–900 scoring, eight visible grades, evidence coverage, source corroboration, versioned token-score history, presale intake, AI chart analysis, and public project retrieval.
Broader provider and chain coverage, deeper wallet-graph and unlock intelligence, richer longitudinal analytics, verified-outcome calibration growth, and continuous accuracy/regression hardening on top of the live versioned scoring, corroboration, governance verification, and observability foundation.
Continuous portfolio monitoring, alerts, wallet activity changes, liquidity events, and score-change explanations.
Publish the official contract and final tokenomics, then convert temporary Launch Access into the $CLAI Holder Tier with a defined minimum balance and daily core-scan allowance. Holder status controls access only and never changes scoring.
Guardian and Sentinel premium intelligence, exports, higher service levels, deeper history, monitoring, API credits, and early feature access.
APIs, embeddable scores, partner integrations, mobile tools, and a broader crypto risk-intelligence graph—subject to evidence quality and product readiness.